Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

16,770,373

Short Interest Shares

283,003

Float (%)

87.59

Institutional Ownership (%)

42.39

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

20.91

Insider Ownership (%)

12.41

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

29.93

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,218,056	7.26	41,901,126	3/31/2018	(7,422)
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,088,396	6.49	37,440,822	3/31/2018	37,216
Vanguard Group Inc.	693,658	4.14	23,861,835	3/31/2018	32,049
Systematic Financial Management L.P.	646,040	3.85	22,223,776	3/31/2018	(4,152)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	357,336	2.13	12,292,358	3/31/2018	(835)
LSV Asset Management	269,866	1.61	9,283,390	3/31/2018	0
Renaissance Technologies LLC	219,800	1.31	7,561,120	3/31/2018	10,200
JP Morgan Asset Management	199,496	1.19	6,862,662	3/31/2018	(17,875)
Northern Trust Global Investments	192,566	1.15	6,624,270	3/31/2018	(1,718)
PanAgora Asset Management Inc.	133,452	0.80	4,590,749	3/31/2018	30,666
Geode Capital Management LLC	127,993	0.76	4,402,959	3/31/2018	3,257
Summit Community Bank Inc.	112,125	0.67	3,857,100	3/31/2018	(2,050)
BNY Asset Management	106,532	0.64	3,664,701	3/31/2018	2,168
PGIM Inc.	106,143	0.63	3,651,319	3/31/2018	3,300
Bridgeway Capital Management Inc.	105,300	0.63	3,622,320	3/31/2018	0
Segall Bryant & Hamill LLC	101,368	0.60	3,487,059	9/30/2017	0
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	98,570	0.59	3,390,808	3/31/2018	(1,849)
Dalton Greiner Hartman Maher & Co. LLC	96,708	0.58	3,326,755	3/31/2018	(1,287)
TIAA	71,949	0.43	2,475,046	3/31/2018	0
Morgan Stanley	68,183	0.41	2,345,495	3/31/2018	(8,769)

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.