Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

17,710,285

Short Interest Shares

323,722

Float (%)

88.18

Institutional Ownership (%)

40.70

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

20.97

Insider Ownership (%)

11.82

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

30.43

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock, Inc.	1,596,321	9.01	32,213,758	3/31/2020	328,320
Dimensional Fund Advisors L.P.	1,096,521	6.19	22,127,794	3/31/2020	(57,480)
Vanguard Group Inc.	768,906	4.34	15,516,523	3/31/2020	50,466
Systematic Financial Management, L.P.	558,130	3.15	11,263,063	3/31/2020	(20,250)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	358,204	2.02	7,228,557	3/31/2020	3,002
Renaissance Technologies LLC	254,800	1.44	5,141,864	3/31/2020	(14,692)
Geode Capital Management LLC	236,826	1.34	4,779,149	3/31/2020	44,664
Northern Trust Global Investments	219,909	1.24	4,437,764	3/31/2020	26,991
Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co., LLC	173,266	0.98	3,496,508	6/30/2020	3,467
BNY Asset Management	125,475	0.71	2,532,086	6/30/2020	(9,887)
Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.	99,804	0.56	2,014,045	6/30/2020	14,119
JP Morgan Asset Management	97,881	0.55	1,975,239	6/30/2020	(5,175)
JPMorgan Chase & Co.	69,485	0.39	1,402,207	6/30/2020	10,740
TIAA	67,715	0.38	1,366,489	6/30/2020	5,524
Martingale Asset Management, L.P.	55,905	0.32	1,128,163	6/30/2020	1,300
HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited	55,532	0.31	1,120,636	3/31/2020	6,928
Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co. LLC	51,175	0.29	1,032,712	3/31/2020	(18,177)
Russell Investment Management, LLC	50,269	0.28	1,014,428	6/30/2020	4,773
Los Angeles Capital Management and Equity Research, Inc.	46,883	0.26	946,099	6/30/2020	25,540
Two Sigma Advisers LP	46,174	0.26	931,791	3/31/2020	36,700

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 131)

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.