Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

16,939,856

Short Interest Shares

135,617

Float (%)

87.72

Institutional Ownership (%)

41.45

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

20.42

Insider Ownership (%)

12.28

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

29.29

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,225,478	7.23	38,210,404	12/31/2017	17,167
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,051,180	6.21	32,775,792	12/31/2017	25,677
Vanguard Group Inc.	661,609	3.91	20,628,969	12/31/2017	6,073
Systematic Financial Management L.P.	650,192	3.84	20,272,987	12/31/2017	(19,609)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	358,171	2.11	11,167,772	12/31/2017	28,738
LSV Asset Management	269,866	1.59	8,414,422	12/31/2017	0
JP Morgan Asset Management	217,371	1.28	6,777,628	12/31/2017	(8,700)
Renaissance Technologies LLC	209,600	1.24	6,535,328	12/31/2017	6,700
Northern Trust Global Investments	194,284	1.15	6,057,775	12/31/2017	(6,764)
Geode Capital Management LLC	124,736	0.74	3,889,268	12/31/2017	644
Summit Community Bank Inc.	112,125	0.66	3,496,058	3/31/2018	(2,050)
Bridgeway Capital Management Inc.	105,300	0.62	3,283,254	12/31/2017	0
BNY Asset Management	104,364	0.62	3,254,070	12/31/2017	(1,433)
PGIM Inc.	102,843	0.61	3,206,645	12/31/2017	(2,522)
PanAgora Asset Management Inc.	102,786	0.61	3,204,867	12/31/2017	23,027
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	100,419	0.59	3,131,064	12/31/2017	14,761
Dalton Greiner Hartman Maher & Co. LLC	97,995	0.58	3,055,484	12/31/2017	20,679
Morgan Stanley	76,952	0.45	2,399,363	12/31/2017	13,204
Martingale Asset Management L.P.	73,321	0.43	2,286,149	12/31/2017	11,406
TIAA	71,949	0.42	2,243,370	12/31/2017	(2,717)

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.