Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

17,700,728

Short Interest Shares

301,675

Float (%)

86.74

Institutional Ownership (%)

42.36

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

21.98

Insider Ownership (%)

13.26

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

32.13

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,596,321	9.02	36,220,523	3/31/2020	328,320
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,096,521	6.19	24,880,061	3/31/2020	(57,480)
Vanguard Group Inc.	768,906	4.34	17,446,477	3/31/2020	50,466
Systematic Financial Management L.P.	558,130	3.15	12,663,970	3/31/2020	(20,250)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	358,204	2.02	8,127,649	3/31/2020	3,002
Renaissance Technologies LLC	254,800	1.44	5,781,412	3/31/2020	(14,692)
Geode Capital Management LLC	236,826	1.34	5,373,582	3/31/2020	44,664
Northern Trust Global Investments	219,909	1.24	4,989,735	3/31/2020	26,991
Dalton Greiner Hartman Maher & Co. LLC	169,799	0.96	3,852,739	3/31/2020	4,891
BNY Asset Management	135,362	0.76	3,071,364	3/31/2020	330
JP Morgan Asset Management	103,056	0.58	2,338,341	3/31/2020	(4,375)
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	99,804	0.56	2,264,553	3/31/2020	14,119
TIAA	67,715	0.38	1,536,453	3/31/2020	5,524
Assenagon Asset Management S.A.	62,579	0.35	1,419,918	3/31/2020	62,579
JPMorgan Chase & Co.	58,745	0.33	1,332,924	3/31/2020	2,215
Martingale Asset Management L.P.	55,905	0.32	1,268,484	3/31/2020	1,300
HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Ltd.	55,532	0.31	1,260,021	3/31/2020	6,928
Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co. LLC	51,175	0.29	1,161,161	3/31/2020	(18,177)
Two Sigma Advisers LP	46,174	0.26	1,047,688	3/31/2020	36,700
Russell Investment Management LLC	45,496	0.26	1,032,304	3/31/2020	23,726

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 132)

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.