Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

17,710,285

Short Interest Shares

156,445

Float (%)

88.13

Institutional Ownership (%)

40.41

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

21.06

Insider Ownership (%)

11.87

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

30.81

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,621,584	9.16	31,993,852	6/30/2020	25,263
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,106,863	6.25	21,838,407	6/30/2020	10,342
Vanguard Group Inc.	780,395	4.41	15,397,193	6/30/2020	11,489
Systematic Financial Management L.P.	503,898	2.85	9,941,908	6/30/2020	(54,232)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	378,429	2.14	7,466,404	6/30/2020	20,225
Northern Trust Global Investments	276,529	1.56	5,455,917	6/30/2020	56,620
Renaissance Technologies LLC	248,100	1.40	4,895,013	6/30/2020	(6,700)
Geode Capital Management LLC	242,056	1.37	4,775,765	6/30/2020	5,230
BNY Asset Management	125,475	0.71	2,475,622	6/30/2020	(9,887)
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	103,418	0.58	2,040,437	6/30/2020	3,614
JP Morgan Asset Management	97,881	0.55	1,931,192	6/30/2020	(5,175)
Dalton Greiner Hartman Maher & Co. LLC	97,315	0.55	1,920,025	9/30/2020	(75,951)
TIAA	75,279	0.43	1,485,255	6/30/2020	7,564
HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Ltd.	58,288	0.33	1,150,022	6/30/2020	2,756
Martingale Asset Management L.P.	55,905	0.32	1,103,006	6/30/2020	0
Russell Investment Management LLC	50,269	0.28	991,807	6/30/2020	4,773
Los Angeles Capital Management & Equity Research Inc.	46,883	0.26	925,002	6/30/2020	25,540
Summit Community Bank Inc.	45,749	0.26	902,628	9/30/2020	1,193
Sheets Smith Wealth Management	43,165	0.24	851,645	6/30/2020	0
Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co. LLC	42,974	0.24	847,877	6/30/2020	(8,201)

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 123)

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.