Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

15,756,830

Short Interest Shares

578,514

Float (%)

87.07

Institutional Ownership (%)

42.26

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

21.51

Insider Ownership (%)

12.93

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

31.91

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,223,159	7.76	38,847,530	3/31/2019	(32,546)
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,196,461	7.59	37,999,601	3/31/2019	19,347
Vanguard Group Inc.	727,750	4.62	23,113,340	3/31/2019	54,730
Systematic Financial Management L.P.	640,642	4.07	20,346,790	3/31/2019	(8,728)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	348,002	2.21	11,052,544	3/31/2019	(17,153)
Renaissance Technologies LLC	258,653	1.64	8,214,819	3/31/2019	5,253
Northern Trust Global Investments	191,200	1.21	6,072,512	3/31/2019	(5,831)
Geode Capital Management LLC	172,711	1.10	5,485,301	3/31/2019	18,170
Dalton Greiner Hartman Maher & Co. LLC	141,133	0.90	4,482,384	6/30/2019	(14,512)
JP Morgan Asset Management	128,206	0.81	4,071,823	3/31/2019	(53,390)
Summit Community Bank Inc.	105,542	0.67	3,352,014	6/30/2019	(1,573)
BNY Asset Management	100,971	0.64	3,206,839	3/31/2019	(987)
LSV Asset Management	87,200	0.55	2,769,472	3/31/2019	(117,698)
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	82,315	0.52	2,614,324	3/31/2019	(212)
PanAgora Asset Management Inc.	73,172	0.46	2,323,943	3/31/2019	27,617
Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co. LLC	66,252	0.42	2,104,164	3/31/2019	66,252
TIAA	62,276	0.40	1,977,886	3/31/2019	781
Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC	51,223	0.33	1,626,842	3/31/2019	(5,224)
WEDGE Capital Management L.L.P.	47,717	0.30	1,515,492	3/31/2019	3,397
Bridgeway Capital Management Inc.	41,000	0.26	1,302,160	3/31/2019	0

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 125)

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.