Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

15,580,862

Short Interest Shares

733,072

Float (%)

86.82

Institutional Ownership (%)

41.48

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

22.16

Insider Ownership (%)

13.18

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

32.13

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,243,129	7.98	38,947,232	9/30/2019	30,057
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,179,014	7.57	36,938,509	9/30/2019	(10,266)
Vanguard Group Inc.	736,743	4.73	23,082,158	9/30/2019	5,822
Systematic Financial Management L.P.	575,790	3.70	18,039,501	9/30/2019	(43,430)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	348,849	2.24	10,929,439	9/30/2019	(4,501)
Renaissance Technologies LLC	263,692	1.69	8,261,470	9/30/2019	18,192
Northern Trust Global Investments	196,101	1.26	6,143,844	9/30/2019	(318)
Geode Capital Management LLC	187,261	1.20	5,866,887	9/30/2019	4,061
Dalton Greiner Hartman Maher & Co. LLC	157,792	1.01	4,943,623	9/30/2019	13,073
JP Morgan Asset Management	118,156	0.76	3,701,827	9/30/2019	(10,025)
BNY Asset Management	99,151	0.64	3,106,401	9/30/2019	(3,198)
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	84,705	0.54	2,653,808	9/30/2019	1,808
Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co. LLC	69,352	0.45	2,172,798	9/30/2019	3,300
TIAA	64,425	0.41	2,018,435	9/30/2019	(696)
PanAgora Asset Management Inc.	63,204	0.41	1,980,181	9/30/2019	(10,179)
Acadian Asset Management LLC	54,676	0.35	1,712,999	9/30/2019	6,265
Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC	52,278	0.34	1,637,870	6/30/2019	1,055
Summit Community Bank Inc.	41,665	0.27	1,305,364	9/30/2019	(63,877)
JPMorgan Chase & Co.	41,494	0.27	1,300,007	9/30/2019	2,624
Bridgeway Capital Management Inc.	41,000	0.26	1,284,530	9/30/2019	0

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 125)

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.